A Sense of Proportion

Talking of Edward IV and Henry IV (see a previous post) has reminded me of Ravenspur.  A crucial harbour.  You see it was at Ravenspur that both of them - 72 years apart - landed to depose the ruling monarch and become king of England.

 

Henry IV landed at Ravenspur in 1399 to depose Richard II (and then have him killed, as one does in these circumstances).  Edward IV landed at Ravenspur in 1471 to depose Henry VI (for the second time; and this time, having learned his lesson, to have him duly killed in the normal manner). 

 

What do you mean, where's Ravenspur?  How the hell should I know.  It was somewhere in the Humber estuary but it fell into the sea ages ago and no-one now knows exactly where it was.  A victim of coastal erosion, or something.

 

But how have we managed without it?  Goodness knows, but somehow we seem to have done. 

 

I wonder if anyone did a survey 500 years ago asking which would have the greater effect on England if they were to disappear into the sea - Ravenspur or the Maldives?  ('Ooh-arh, good sir, I shouldn't like to catch maldives.  Very unpleasant it sounds, by my troth.') 

 

This has then prompted me to think about polar bears.  I've never met one; and I'm told they can run at 25 mph and they attack people with a view to eating them.  Looking at my diary, I'm not sure it would really cause me any great problem in the next year or so if there weren't any polar bears.

 

However, I am obviously wary about species becoming extinct. 

 

Most notably, I am very worried about the smallpox virus.  Apparently there are only a very few left, kept in test tubes, and there are long-established plans to exterminate them as a 'final solution'.  This seems very 'anti-planet' when the smallpox virus has done so much in the past to cut down an alleged source of global-warming - human beings.

Posted on 3 December, 2009
|
2 comments :
1
Posted on 3 December, 2009 by Old Tom
We don't need smallpox....just a good old war which also solves all unemplyoment problems. Lots of cannon fodder in estates all over the country.
2
Posted on 5 December, 2009 by Val
There is nothing wrong with the planet that wouldn't be solved by a huge reduction in the human population. If climate change is man made then we should reduce the number of men (and women). How about a one child policy? A war might work quicker, but might mess up the planet even more, if it went biological or nuclear. I think a war over oil might be on the cards at some point.
I have a couple of questions about supposed climate change:
How does the heat from the sun get trapped under the clouds, if it can get through the clouds from the other side?
Maybe they shouldn't be cutting down the rain forests, me thinks that might have an effect on CO2. Ah, but they are poor people who need the money, so that's alright then.
 

Make A Comment:

Your Name:

Characters left: 5000